Part XVI: Special Provisions Relating to Certain Classes

Article 333: Representation of the Anglo-Indian Community

Original Article:

Notwithstanding anything in Article 170, the Governor of a State may, if he is of opinion that the Anglo-Indian community needs representation in the Legislative Assembly of the State and is not adequately represented therein, nominate one member of that community to the Assembly.

Explanations:

Article 333 ensures representation for the Anglo-Indian community in State Legislative Assemblies, allowing the Governor to nominate one member from the community if they lack adequate representation. This provision reflects India's commitment to protecting minority rights and fostering inclusivity within the democratic framework.

Clause-by-Clause Explanation:

Nomination Clause:

The Governor can nominate one Anglo-Indian representative to the Legislative Assembly to ensure their representation when deemed inadequate.

Impact of Nomination:

The clause addresses the historical and cultural contributions of the Anglo-Indian community while ensuring their voice in governance processes.

Legislative History:

Article 333 was introduced to provide representation for the Anglo-Indian community, a group with a distinct cultural identity. Amendments such as the Constitution (Twenty-third Amendment) Act, 1969, refined the provision by limiting the nomination to one member per state.

Amendments:

• Constitution (Twenty-third Amendment) Act, 1969: Limited Anglo-Indian representation to one nominated member in the Legislative Assembly.
• Seventh Amendment, 1956: Removed the reference to "Rajpramukh," centralizing nomination powers with the Governor.

Debates and Deliberations:

The Constituent Assembly debated the inclusion of Article 333 to ensure minority communities, such as the Anglo-Indians, were adequately represented in governance. Members like Frank Anthony highlighted the community's contributions to India, emphasizing the need for their representation in the democratic process.