Part IXA: The Municipalities
Article 243V: Disqualifications for Membership

Original Article:
A person may be disqualified from being a member of a Municipality based on State laws or specific disqualifications outlined by State Legislatures.
Amendments:
Introduced by the 74th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992, Article 243V ensures that members of Municipalities adhere to high standards of integrity and accountability.
Explanation:
Article 243V details the grounds for disqualifications of Municipal members, reflecting principles of electoral integrity and fairness within local governance structures.
Clause-by-Clause Explanation:
- State Election Laws: Aligns disqualification criteria with those for State Legislature elections.
- State-specific Disqualifications: Grants State Legislatures authority to impose additional criteria.
- Resolution of Disputes: Specifies the process for handling disqualification disputes.
Legislative History:
The 74th Amendment introduced Article 243V to maintain consistency in election criteria across State Legislatures and Municipalities.
Real-life Examples:
- In Maharashtra, Municipal members with unpaid property taxes faced disqualification under State laws aligning with Article 243V.
- In Tamil Nadu, additional disqualifications were imposed on candidates with criminal records, promoting accountability.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs):
Disqualifications include those applicable to State Legislature elections and additional criteria set by State laws.
The authority designated by the State Legislature resolves disputes regarding Municipal member disqualification.
Yes, State Legislatures can impose additional disqualifications specific to their governance needs.
Debates and Deliberations:
During discussions on the 74th Amendment:
- Mr. Arun Jaitley emphasized the need for consistency in disqualification criteria across governance levels.
- Ms. Mamata Banerjee advocated for state-specific disqualifications to address regional governance challenges.