Part VIII: The Union Territories

Article 242: Omission of Coorg

Overview of Article 242: Omission of Coorg

Original Article:

Article 242 originally addressed the administration of Coorg as a distinct region. It was omitted following the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, when Coorg was merged into the state of Mysore (now Karnataka).

Amendments:

  • Omitted by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956.

Amendment Explanation:

Article 242 was omitted to reflect the administrative reorganization of states. Coorg, which was previously a distinct administrative unit, was integrated into Mysore (now Karnataka) for linguistic and administrative unity.

Explanations:

The omission of Article 242 represents the shift towards reorganizing India’s states based on linguistic and cultural identity, streamlining governance and reducing administrative fragmentation.

Historical Significance:

Coorg’s inclusion in Mysore was a significant move towards integrating smaller administrative units into larger states, fostering regional cohesion and governance efficiency.

Debates and Deliberations:

  • Shri H.V. Kamath: Supported the reorganization for linguistic coherence.
  • Dr. B.R. Ambedkar: Highlighted the need for fewer administrative units for stronger governance.

Real-Life Examples:

  • Integration of Coorg: Facilitated streamlined governance within Karnataka.
  • Reduction of Smaller Units: Improved administrative efficiency post-1956 reorganization.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs):

Why was Article 242 omitted?

It was omitted after Coorg’s integration into Mysore as part of the 1956 state reorganization.

What was Coorg’s status before the omission?

Coorg was a distinct administrative region with special recognition in the Constitution.

How did the omission of Article 242 impact Coorg?

Coorg became part of Mysore (now Karnataka), aligning its administration with the state.

References:

  • The Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956
  • Reorganization of States Report, 1956