Part IX: The Panchayats
Article 243M: Part Not to Apply to Certain Areas

Original Article:
Nothing in this Part shall apply to Scheduled Areas, tribal areas, and specific states or regions listed under this Article.
Amendments:
Clause (3A) was inserted by the 83rd Amendment, 2000, exempting Arunachal Pradesh from reservations under Article 243D.
Explanation:
Article 243M provides exemptions for certain regions from the application of Panchayati Raj provisions under Part IX, acknowledging diverse governance needs across India.
Clause-by-Clause Explanation:
- Scheduled and Tribal Areas: Excludes areas listed under Article 244 for their unique governance needs.
- Specific States and Regions: Exempts Nagaland, Meghalaya, Mizoram, and other hill areas with existing governance structures.
- Legislative Extensions: Allows states to extend Part IX provisions by passing resolutions with a two-thirds majority.
Legislative History:
Introduced through the 73rd Amendment, this Article recognizes the distinct cultural and administrative needs of certain regions, protecting their autonomy.
Real-life Examples:
- In Nagaland, traditional Naga customary laws govern village councils, exempting the region from Part IX provisions.
- The Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996, tailors Panchayat governance for tribal areas.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs):
Scheduled and tribal areas, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Mizoram, and Manipur’s hill areas are exempted.
It exempts Arunachal Pradesh from seat reservations under Article 243D.
Yes, states can pass resolutions to extend Part IX provisions, or Parliament can enact tailored legislation.
Debates and Deliberations:
During discussions on the 73rd Amendment:
- Mr. Shibu Soren argued for preserving tribal governance structures.
- Dr. Manmohan Singh emphasized the importance of legislative flexibility for exempted areas.
- Ms. Uma Bharti supported tailored governance for cultural and regional autonomy.